Mr. Liu’s legal professional in Beijing, who shared the video on Weibo beneath her verified account, stated that based on her consumer the video was genuine.
“The surveillance video speaks for itself, as does the prosecutor’s choice to not deliver fees towards our consumer,” Jill Brisbois, Mr. Liu’s legal professional in the US, stated in a press release. “We imagine in his innocence, which is firmly supported by the entire proof, and we’ll proceed to vigorously defend his repute in court docket.”
The video is silent, however subtitles make the purpose so no person will miss it. “The lady confirmed Richard Liu into the elevator,” says one. “The lady pushed the ground button voluntarily,” says one other. “As soon as once more,” says a 3rd, “the girl gestured an invite.”
Nonetheless, the video doesn’t present essentially the most essential second, which is what occurred between Mr. Liu and Ms. Liu after the condominium door closed.
“The complete video depicts a younger lady unable to find her personal condominium and a billionaire instructing her to take his arm to regular her gait,” stated Wil Florin, Ms. Liu’s legal professional, who accused Mr. Liu’s representatives of releasing the video. “The discharge of an incomplete video and the forceful silencing of Jingyao’s many social media supporters is not going to cease a Minnesota civil jury from listening to the reality.”
JD.com declined to touch upon the origin of the video.
Within the eyes of many, it contradicted the narrative in Ms. Liu’s lawsuit of an harmless, helpless sufferer. In my WeChat teams, women and men alike stated the video confirmed their suspicions that Ms. Liu was asking for intercourse and was solely after Mr. Liu’s cash. A younger lady from an excellent household would by no means socialize on a enterprise event like that, some males stated. A businesswoman requested why Ms. Liu didn’t say no to drinks.
At first, I noticed the video as a setback for China’s #MeToo motion, which was already going through insurmountable obstacles from a deeply misogynistic society, web censors and a patriarchal authorities. Already, my “no means no” arguments with acquaintances had been met with groans.